See Full HTML Site

Editorial: Recent PRT incidents are a call to action

By Staff

Published: Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, March 2, 2010

It's pretty safe to say anyone who has ridden West Virginia University's PRT system has some kind of horror story.

Typically, it's the same complaint – it breaks down or it's is late getting to one station over another. However, recent incidents have proven to be more serious.

We've had multiple reports from riders about seeing a PRT car filled with smoke and a fire erupting in one of the cars Thursday.

Students in the car were then forced to walk the tracks as the system came to a complete stop – a safeguard for such incidents.

However, these incidents have been downplayed by the University.

The issues were attributed to "minor problems" and "arching electrical phases on track" that "caused a flash and cloud of smoke," according to Director of Transportation and Parking Hugh Kierig, by way of Becky Lofstead, assistant vice president for University Communications.

As reported in Monday's edition of The Daily Athenaeum, University spokesman John Bolt said there had been several electrical problems but none were major.

The PRT is synonymous with its problems, despite continual reassurances from University-provided statistics of high reliability and constant uptime.

The system is a flawed behemoth. There isn't enough money to completely overhaul the system, despite constant funding being poured into it for upgrades.

Most recently, the University closed the system for an entire summer, spending $2.5 million on track and system issues.

These upgrades weren't designed to fix all issues, and they haven't.

The system's uptime is, at least, available through WVU Mobile and MIX – saving students the frustration of walking to a station to find it shut down.

We do, however, for the safety of the community that rides it daily, ask the University to seriously consider shutting it down for an extended period of time.

It doesn't matter if these incidents are isolated.

The system could benefit from an extended period of downtime – not just a summer, perhaps even a year or two – to fully diagnose constant problems.

The University is likely to unveil an overhaul for the system in its next strategic plan.

Whether or not it will be a comprehensive upgrade or just another series of patch-jobs remains to be seen.

The PRT is a symbol of the University and an icon of Morgantown. It is an important system connecting the University's varied campus locations.

We don't believe the University would, for one minute, continue to run a system they didn't genuinely believe was safe for its riders.

However, these more serious issues – beyond the delays or repetitive breakdowns – deserve more extensive attention.
 

Comments

18 comments
Cowboy Chris
Thu Mar 11 2010 12:51
Where is Mr. Fire Marshall whwn you need him. Oh, I forgot that the University is exempt from safety.

The only people who speak positvie about the PRT are those thate work for it.

Anonymous
Thu Mar 11 2010 09:52
I rode the prt once. It took off up into the sky and flew around before landing back on the rails. I thought it was sort of strange, but I liked it. So the PRT should stay.
Profit
Wed Mar 10 2010 14:53
"There is NOTHING unsafe about the PRT. Their perfect safety record speaks for itself. If the PRT was a danger, someone would have been injured long before now."

Most passenger jets that have crashed have had a perfect safety record too. You know, up until the crash. And what follows is the inevitable conversation of "signs ignored", "perfect storm of mistakes", "crossed wires". "information not passed higher" etc. Better to handle these problems now before they amount to something serious. Regardless of "exaggeration" the fact remains that there was a problem that caused some sort of an explosion, or loud boom, followed by smoke. This is not something to be taken lightly. Any situation where there is "smoke" billowing from a driverless/pilotless vehicle is cause for concern.

What would could have happened in a "perfect storm" situation? I.e. The smoke indicates a fire, the fire catches on with rubber and other flammable components, the doors fail to open and maybe they due, but the track fails to shutdown properly... To ignore the implications of on "minor incident" is to ignore the possibilities of a "major catastrophe". Though improbable for all these things, or even a few to occur at once, it is not impossible. And every incident should be regarded as such.

"Mr. President, Shut down these tracks!"

Matt
Mon Mar 8 2010 21:53
The PRT is the definition of a failed government experiment in public transportation (read up on it's history and costs). It's unfortunate that the school didn't scrap the system in the 80s or 90s and come up with a more efficient and logical solution (put the hand full freshman engineering classes in the same locations as math, chem, physics, etc anyone?) before Morgantown became overcrowded, but the reality is that it would be impossible to get rid of now without both curbing enrollment and expending a great deal of money.
Anonymous
Sun Mar 7 2010 21:00
has anyone looked into the history of the GRT (it's not a PRT system)? because they tried to rush the job on a totally new design, mistakes were made and the system was shut down while parts were rebuilt.

WVU should look into converting the system to ULTra. the track is probably close to the same gauge and the external power rails could be eliminated.

Anonymous
Fri Mar 5 2010 16:12
"I find the accounts of an "explosion... five feet in the air" very hard to believe."

I saw it from the porch of my house in Westover, it was rather large. No exaggeration.

Michael Carrato
Thu Mar 4 2010 11:10
PRT=Pieinthesky Rubegoldbergish Transportation
Anonymous
Thu Mar 4 2010 10:46
"Why not replace the PRT with a modern PRT system."

$$$$$$$$. Where's the money for it going to come from? And replacing the PRT system means its going to be down for years. How are students going to get around during that time?

Bengt Gustafsson
Thu Mar 4 2010 02:57
Why not replace the PRT with a modern PRT system. Now there is at least one system on the market that would operate in the winter conditions of Morgantown, and more are being developed. While a modern PRT system would cost more initially, than patching up the old system, in the long run it would be both cheaper and more efficient. It would also be possible to extend the system when needed as it would be possible to buy more track and vehicles from the manufacturer.

The manufacturer I refer to is available at www.vectusprt.com. Another option, although still in development is available at www.beamways.com.

Anonymous
Wed Mar 3 2010 16:54
Why don't they let Engineering students work on the prt as part of some sort of capstone project or something? Its at least a thought. Abolishing the system isn't a plausible idea. We have tons of engineering students on campus who I bet would love to work on ways to improve its functioning.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 22:43
The DA can publish the information any way they want.

These are the facts and they are trying to bring light to a serious situation that the university is trying to shove under the rug.

Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 16:36
I think the DA should be a little bit more careful about what they publish. Everyone is all stirred up about this latest round of PRT failures due to accounts of an "explosion right behind the car that was like five feet in the air," and "another explosion – a bigger one – it left a pretty big hole in the track." For some reason, I was under the impression that the writers and editors of the DA were smart enough to tell the difference between a factual statement and an exaggeration. There was no "hole" blown in the track and due to the lack of combustible materials, I find the accounts of an "explosion... five feet in the air" very hard to believe. When the DA publishes wild exaggerations like this, people assume that these spectacular stories can be believed. In my opinion, publishing this sort of thing constitutes yellow journalism.

All gripes about the DA aside, the PRT does need work. It's a marvelous system for its age, but there is much room for improvement in the areas of efficiency, speed, intelligence, and reliability. There is NOTHING unsafe about the PRT. Their perfect safety record speaks for itself. If the PRT was a danger, someone would have been injured long before now.

To update the PRT to be a more modern and efficient system will require a great deal of funding. In the last PRT master plan, they requested an additional $50 million in funding just to have a professional transportation company upgrade their computer control software. This would likely fix many of the problems with the PRT, but the practically ancient magnetic vehicle controls can't be ignored as a major contributing factor to many failures. Designing and installing a better vehicle tracking/control system would probably add somewhere on the order of $500 million to the price tag. What about new vehicles with better steering and more powerful motors? Your guess on price is as good as mine.

The bottom line is that it will take a pretty penny to modernize the PRT, but it's going to get continually worse until someone decides its time to shell out the dough and a WVU without the PRT just isn't something many of us could imagine. The university may as well fix it now instead of putting it off for later, but shutting the system down for an extended period of time because the DA likes to perpetuate rumors that the system is dangerous is not going to do anyone any good.

wvu dude
Tue Mar 2 2010 16:02
Apparent;y, the person who wrote this article does not have to depend on the PRT to get from one campus or another, and in that sense, it's easy to recommend shutting it down for a year or two so it can be repaired.

I'd like to ask the person who wrote this what he/she would do if he'she had to depend on it to get to class on time and it wasn't there? Are you willing to come and get us at our stops and take us to class if they shut it down? Your suggestion is short sighted.

The PRT does get too much use - I agree - but it's not the students who keep bring more and more people into the university every year. We have nowhere to park, and riding the bus is about as reliable as the PRT itself.

So what would we do without the PRT? We need it whether the person who wrote this article thinks so or not.

WVU '04
Tue Mar 2 2010 13:31
Given the little funding for it and its age, the PRT isn't bad. Further, shutting it down for "a year or two" simply isn't realistic. Traffic already sucks in Morgantown. Do you really want to spend a half hour or more on bus getting from Evansdale to downtown?

The PRT is doing just fine. Stop complaining about it and be happy that it's there.

Chris Prigge
Tue Mar 2 2010 11:25
I wonder why the Morgantown Fire Marshall hasn't closed it down yet for safety reasons or cited people for overcrowding. I guess it's because the University owns it.
Chuck Anziulewicz, Class of '81
Tue Mar 2 2010 10:54
Overall, the PRT has a terrific operational record, and for the most part people don't give it a second thought when it's running just fine. Problem is, people tend to remember those rare occasions when something goes wrong.

The PRT is a model for modern, efficient public transportation that should have been adopted by cities everywhere. If local governments had the wherewithall to invest in identical systems over the years, then there would be a reliable support industry for it, and the system would constantly be improving.

Guy
Tue Mar 2 2010 07:56
Maybe if the PRT had a true, traditional third rail these problems probably wouldn't happen as often.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 01:33
The PRT sucks

Most Popular