Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

National debate surrounding fast-food powerhouse reaches campus

Published: Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Updated: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 00:08

this

Patrick Gorrell/The Daily Athenaeum

Students await their turn to order at Chick-fil-A in the Mountainlair .

Last September, West Virginia University sociology professor Daniel Brewster submitted a guest column to The Daily Athenaeum, with the hope that he could be a voice for change across the University.

In his column, entitled "Enough is enough," Brewster came out to the WVU community and expressed that he felt targeted as a homosexual on campus.

In July, when Chick-fil-A CEO Dan Cathy made a statement confirming his anti-gay beliefs and use of corporate money to support anti-gay organizations, Brewster found it to be the perfect opportunity for change.

In an official statement in regard- to WVU’s Chick-fil-A restaurant in the Mountainlair, University officials said:

"WVU’s Chick-fil-A restaurant in the Mountainlair is an independent contractor which sells the food chain’s product line. The franchise is therefore owned and operated by WVU – and all workers are WVU employees, subject to the policies and procedures of this campus. Those policies and practices are dedicated to promoting a campus environment that supports opportunity, equality, civility and respect for all people. Discrimination or harassment based on sexual orientation or gender will not be tolerated now or in the future."

The University’s statement also said WVU’s contract with the franchise runs until 2015, and the University’s relationship with the franchise will not be reassessed until the conclusion of the contract.

But Brewster wanted more.

"For me it’s not a matter of his speech. In fact, I celebrate his free speech right. What I take issue to is that they have given nearly $5 million to anti-LGBT organizations," he said.

Essa Harris, president of the WVU Queer Student Union, said a percentage of the money from the corporation goes to the organization Family Research, which has supported organizations that support the genocide of many LGBT individuals in Uganda.

"Them giving money to Family Research is very, very harmful," Harris said. "They may not realize it, but you have to take action for unintended consequences."

Brewster said the University should end its contract with the franchise as soon as possible because he believes the corporation’s actions counteract the University’s nondiscrimination policies.

"Us still having a partnership with Chic-fil-A really is a poor reflection of the University," he said.

WVU Chinese studies and psychology senior Brian Gardner created a petition to remove WVU’s Chic-fil-A after hearing of other universities’ initiatives to do so.

"WVU has long supported the LGBT community as well as other groups represented on campus. Chic-fil-A makes a lot of money from WVU’s contract. It is important to review and revoke Chic-Fil-A’s as soon as possible so that no more of WVU’s money can be used toward funding the anti-gay groups," he said. "The University needs to take action sooner rather than later."

While many members and supporters of the LGBT community have vowed to avoid the company, many WVU students are indifferent.

"I don’t agree with what they are doing, and I don’t have a problem with homosexuality, but I don’t think it should be removed from the Lair," said junior French student Brian Falls. "Yes, the company is at fault, but removing it from the Lair seems like a dumb idea."

Freshman journalism student Justin McClure said while the company’s views may not reflect his own, the quality of the food is what keeps him coming back for more.

"I agree that they may not share the same views as average Americans, but I just really like the food," he said.

A student who wished to remain anonymous said he enjoys the convenience of the franchise’s location in the Mountainlair.

"I really don’t know what all the policies and politics are, but I keep coming back to Chic-fil-A for the convenience," he said. "Like today, I was waiting in line at Quizno’s, and it was taking forever, so I went to Chic-fil-A where it was much faster. We’re students; we have fast-paced lives. I don’t care what’s there, but if it’s fast, I’m going to eat it."

The Human Rights Campaign recently released a ranking of the best businesses by its standards, Brewster said.

Brewster said the University currently has relationships with five of the HRC’s bust businesses, including Coca-Cola, Starbucks, Barnes & Noble, PNC Bank and Nike.

"People are always trying to squish the free speech rights of the Westboro Baptist Church," he said. "I don’t understand why people have a selective interpretation of freedom of speech."

Brewster said he believes if the University were to take action it would bring about the toleration and acceptance he has been searching for on campus.

"This would be the perfect opportunity for WVU to show me that I was wrong and that this University is a welcoming campus for the LGBT community."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

44 comments

Anonymous
Wed Oct 3 2012 09:10
It's amazing that someone who has been bullied, verbally assaulted, and publicly humiliated throughout his life (which is a sad thing) and has written an article saying "Enough is enough" about said bullying actually has the nerve to bully others. And what makes it worse is he uses his position of authority in the classroom as a pulpit to attack others. Brewster should be ashamed of himself. I personally think he needs counseling, and that isn't a negative remark; someone who has hidden who they are and been subjected to bullying usually does need counseling.
Anonymous
Wed Sep 19 2012 12:39
It's no surprise that Brewster receives mostly favorable reviews, either. But that doesn't tell the whole story- he scares off a majority of the people that would give him negative reviews and/or complain about his teaching practices on the first day. He is a poor educator.

And it has nothing to do with the fact that he is homosexual or a liberal. Everyone can live their lives however they choose. But the personal views and opinions of educators should not dominate the classroom as they do in his. The ironic thing is, Brewster claims to strive for acceptance and open-mindedness, but his attacks on those who don't hold his views show he doesn't live those values himself- which is typical; those who cry out for acceptance are often the last to accept others that differ from their worldview. And if one is willing to give up friendships and disown family members over politics, as Brewster claims he will, then that individual is not open-minded or accepting of other people's views at all.

Anonymous
Mon Sep 17 2012 12:20
WVU needs to do a thorough evaluation of Brewster's teaching methods. Enough is enough.
Anonymous
Mon Sep 10 2012 13:13
WVU has plenty of religious organizations which naturally also oppose same sex marriage. Will Brewster call for booting the Campus Crusade for Chist or the Newman Club off of campus? How about the Muslim Student Association? Of course not! That would make it too obvious who the real purveyor of intolerance is.
Anonymous
Fri Aug 24 2012 23:02
FormerStudent3: I've been to the first day, and he's not quite as cordial as you say, or at least he wasn't when I was there. (His words were "I'm a raging liberal, and I will not try to be impartial in class. I will challenge you if you challenge me. Conservatives usually feel uncomfortable and I suggest you drop the course, because you and I will not get along"). And I've spoken to students who stayed in the class, and he degrades people that disagree with him. Professors shouldn't do that. I took a Philosophy class, current moral problems, where every class centered around debating a relevant topic like abortion, immigration, death penalty, etc. The professor never once injected his opinion into the course but rather discussed the points and arguments behind both sides of the issue and then mediated impartially as the students presented and debated their own views. No one was ever put down, called a moron, or called stupid for their opinions, and the class never got hostile. No one ever felt uncomfortable. That is the way it should be. Not what Brewster does.
FormerStudent3
Fri Aug 24 2012 16:23
the funny thing about most of these comments, is the fact that most of the people commenting have never had Brewster as a teacher, nor have they been to the "dreaded first day". Brewster says on the first day... I am a raging liberal, I am not going to back down from addressing the issues in the world of sociology and I will say things that at times are controversial (hello its sociology.. abortion, gay marriage, politics). He says that conservatives will have a hard time in this class if you are not comfortable with discussing these issues. He said to my class that most of you claim conservatism but don't know enough to even back it up. That is when he says his famous drop the class if you can't take me or my liberal views. He does spare with students when they answer or challenge him, he enjoys it but every teacher that teaches a class centered on discussing does. He will make people look stupid who clearly are just regurgitating things they have heard from the news or their parents. If you cannot defend your views about topics like I was able to when I took his class (im conservative surprise) then maybe you don't really have a strong foundation to even support those views. You must be able to defend and say why, simply believing or deciding something makes us complacent and closed minded. People will probably lash out at this but it is the truth, calling yourself conservative does not make you conservative you must actually have those views and know why.
Anonymous
Fri Aug 24 2012 11:44
You know what, your right. I just did not make that jump, but I do agree with you about class choice. It is the students University, they pay a lot of money to study there. I know, I have two students attending. Mr. Brewster needs to teach his classes for All students. If the students want to hear his opinion they can sponsor him as a guest speaker aomewhere, but not on my kids dime!
Anonymous
Fri Aug 24 2012 11:15
You can't just say "don't take the guys class." First of all, some people probably don't have a choice and have to take his class, and second of all, in a major university, there should not be ANY class that anyone feels uncomfortable taking because of their political beliefs. And its even worse when the professor outright tells you that you will hate the class if you are of a particular political affiliation. If he can't teach the class in a neutral manner that allows everyone's ideas to be heard and respected, then he shouldn't be teaching. Period. I don't know how you can argue differently. And Brewster just flat out refuses to address that issue. The University should force him to address it or tell him to hit the road.
Anonymous
Fri Aug 24 2012 10:08
Mr. Brewster, I think what some people are torn about here is your opening statements to your classes vs your comments regarding a business owners opinions. You stated in the article that having this restaurant on campus is a poor reflection on the University. Yet many of your past and present students feel the same about you. The restaurants owner has an opinion on marriage. You have an opinion about conservatives. You represent the University in a position where you are one on one with the students. Your opinion is heard Monday thru Friday on
campus. Don't eat the chicken, or don't take the guys class. Everybody has a choice.
TO THE FIRST FORMER STUDENT who called one of the comments ignorant; MR. Brewster may have opened doors for you and others, but he shut others with differing opinions down in his classroom from day one.
JC
Thu Aug 23 2012 23:16
My apologies, I can see how that was confusing, I entered freshman orientation when I first met Daniel Brewster at age 17, registered to vote after my 18th birthday in August.
JC
Thu Aug 23 2012 23:05
My apologies, came into the freshman orientation as 17, registered to vote at 18, my birth date is in august.
Anonymous
Thu Aug 23 2012 22:49
How were you 17 and a registered republican? Gotta be 18 to vote.
JC
Thu Aug 23 2012 22:24
I cannot believe all of this negative feedback I see about Daniel Brewster. I had my first encounter with this individual as a 17 year old freshman at WVU. I entered his Sociology 101 classroom originating from a rural, white, conservative, and bigoted area of WV. I came into his class with engrained beliefs stemming from my upbringing (mainly from my parents) that being gay was a "choice", that African Americans were of lower status than white Americans, among other stereotypes. I also entered the university as a registered republican , selecting to do so only because my parents were registered republicans. I knew nothing of politics, or much of varying cultures. His research and teaching opened my eyes to a world that I never knew existed. A world of love and violence, a world of exotic cultures, and a world of difference . Now, 7 years later, I am proud to say I am a successful professional, I am a registered democrat, I have studied and traveled around the world. I hold two B.A. degrees and a M.A. degree , graduated Summa Cum Laude from WVU. The reason for the start of my radical change? I owe it all to this young man, whom without I wouldn't have had the courage to study different cultures, ethnicities, or values. I would have not been able to break out of my ethnocentric rural WV way of thinking if it wasn't for this eye opening individual.

Daniel Brewster has done so much for so many (e.g., Uganda, Ryan Diviney, Article titled "Enough is Enough"), I am astounded at how many individuals cannot appreciate all he has done for this community. I almost feel silly for explaining how much he has affected me personally. Without this individual, I would have not had the courage to travel the world, not to mention have the courage to come out to my family, and feel comfortable at a university that is located in a red conservative state, as a homosexual. So what if he comes off to his students as liberal? Young adults need to be exposed to all topics, cultures, etc that they are not "used to" or comfortable with in order to be more understand such subjects as adults.

In closing, I support Daniel Brewster as an instructor at this university and firmly believe that he is invaluable to the faculty. Out of the hundreds of courses and instructors that I have had the pleasure to encounter at this university, I can honestly say that none have had such a profound effect on my life as the class I took with Daniel Brewster as a 17 year old freshman. Furthermore, I fully support his proposition to remove Chick Fil A from the WVU Mountainlair. There isn't any room for companies that support discrimination at this great university.

Anon1
Thu Aug 23 2012 21:47
I just want to know why someone without a doctorate has maintained a job at a research university for so long. I realize sociology is a fringe subject, but shouldn't all full-time, long-term faculty have doctorates?
WVU alum student
Thu Aug 23 2012 21:03
I agree with Former Student2...i mean come on, he made my class write a paper on "why it's okay to be gay"...which crossed the line. he did do a lot of good things around WVU (e.g. the ryan diviney fundraiser), however, he degrades people (especially students) more than anybody i know. in my opinion, if i were his supervisor, he would have been fired years ago...
WVUBMONEY
Thu Aug 23 2012 20:47
FormerStudent2 couldn't have said it better.

And for the record, I couldn't care less what his beliefs are. He's entitled to his own just like everyone else. But it is intolerable that he degrades students, in a classroom, because they disagree with him. The University should not tolerate that kind of behavior, plain and simple, no matter what your political views are. This isn't a conservative vs. liberal issue, it's an issue that a WVU Professor is not behaving properly in his class and is mistreating students.

FormerStudent2
Thu Aug 23 2012 20:14
Former Student.....

Look, I've taken Brewster for Sociology 101 and I actually enjoyed his class. He makes you want to come to class by appealing to the average 18 year old (whether it's talking pop-culture, or about issues that affect us directly, or showing good movies). It's just when he constantly babbles on about how Republicans are horrible people, and how everyone who supported Palin and McCain back in 2008 were idiots that you start to get nauseated. I don't care if he's a raging liberal...that's fine. But when he says "He's going to open our minds" it makes him sound like an elitist and that he's better than everybody. There is no "correct" political party to support. His views differ from mine and I'm fine with that. You cross the line when you start calling everybody who has opposing views 'idiots' and embarrass them in class by getting the rest of the students to back him up because they fear the same treatment. He did a lot of good things around the school...the Ryan Diviney Rally is for a great cause and I applaud him for that. I just wish he could be a little more tolerable and realize that there is no perfect party to support (each one has their negatives), and It's fine to support and be passionate about politics...just don't call somebody a "moron" because they disagree with you. That makes you sound like a 3rd grader. Instead...accept people and be supportive as most liberals are.

Former Student
Thu Aug 23 2012 19:50
Once again an ignorant comment.. social activism is what I said and I didn't stutter. I guess you weren't around when he organized with the Kony2012 movement on campus and helped with cover the night bringing light to Uganda. Or maybe you missed when Brewster helped start and support the group on campus to help prevent rape and help those who have been victims of rape. Still there was the time that he was the instrumental leader in a town hall meeting to help stop bullying on our campus. Oh that's right you are only focused on protecting chickfila which I never once commented about. I do not want to see chickfila leave the lair but I don't see why he must be attacked over voicing an opinion. And to finally set the record straight... everyone is not upset that the owner of chickfila is voicing his opinion it is the fact that he is donating so much of the proceeds to an organization that wants to attack a group of people based on their sexual orientation.
Anonymous
Thu Aug 23 2012 18:57
To Former Student: Social activism by Brewster?????? By stating that a private restaurant owners beliefs should mean that his business should be thrown out of the Lair?????? Don't eat at the restaurant.... It's as simple as that. And stop drinking the cool aid while your at it!!!!
Former student
Thu Aug 23 2012 17:31
I would love to see everyone's twitter account who has posted on this article about what he says... It is hilarious that people really feel the need to bring up what he says on a social media site where you are free to say WHATEVER you want about WHOEVER you want. If WVU wanted to control the accounts of the teachers and control their behavior then they need to start with teachers that actually do illegal activity in the classrooms... like providing alcohol during final exams and taking classes out to drink at los! If WVU came down on every teacher that didn't act "professionally" according to all the intellects posting on this article then I am guaranteeing that WVU would have to fire some of the teachers that you all loved. Once again this has become an attack the person who has an opinion that is different from my own. Who gives any of you the right to tell him what he can and cannot say on his twitter, to newspapers or in front of his classes if WVU is not saying anything. I think WVU would be equally embarrassed by the way that so many of these posters have lashed out against a FACULTY member who they hired and have kept on for 8+ years. I wish brewster good luck and hope he finds another school that will actually appreciate his social activism and community outreach that no one has previously commented on. WVU hasn't acted because they support their faculty.




log out