Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Student organization petitions acceptance of ‘unethical’ donations

Published: Thursday, December 10, 2009

Updated: Friday, December 11, 2009 00:12

West Virginia University's Sierra Student Coalition has acquired more than 1,000 signatures since beginning its petition two months ago asking the University to refuse donations from controversial donors.

The petition stemmed from a $1 million donation to WVU from coal executives Bob Murray and Don Blankenship.

Fours leaders from the SSC presented the petition to University President James P. Clements Wednesday.

They met for 10 minutes, and Calvin Smith, outreach director for the SSC, said Clements understood the organization's concerns and showed willingness to continue talks.

WVU spokesperson Dan Kim said Clements will meet with the organization again. He added WVU's College of Engineering and Mineral Resources negotiated the gift, and the WVU Foundation accepted it.

"The donations are given to the foundation," Kim said. "It really is a matter for the foundation in terms of accepting or working donations."

Bill Nevin, director of communications for the foundation, said while the University and foundation work closely together, the foundation is a separate entity.

Gift acceptances are decided on a case-by-case
basis, he said.

The University wouldn't accept donations from terrorist organizations or criminal organizations, Smith said, so it shouldn't from two men who are "criminally negligent."

"We just want our school to set a good examples for our students, make money in ways that are ethical, fund research in ways that are ethical," Smith said. "If West Virginia University is going to go on doing things like that, who's to say nobody else is going to do since West Virginia University is such an esteemed institution."

Smith asked WVU's Student Government Association to help achieve administrative backing.

"They haven't told me what they intend to do," he said. "But they understood my concern just like the president."

SGA Vice President Whitney Rae Peters said Smith approached the Board of Governors at a meeting in November, and the BOG had many opinions on the donation.

"I've talked to some students who seem to think as long as the University is getting money from donors, it's not really bad for us to receive it as long as students are benefitting from it," Peters said.

But the BOG is looking for more information on the donation process and the background of the companies. SGA Gov. Paul Kast and Gov. Abby Sobonya volunteered to send e-mails out over winter break.

"I want to find out more about it," Kast said. "I took this on because I wanted to represent the student body best as possible."

Murray is president of Ohio-based Murray Energy Corporation and owner of Utah's Crandall Canyon Mine, where a series of collapses in August 2007 killed six miners and three would-be rescuers. The federal Mine Safety and Health Administration fined Murray $1.6 million for violations investigators say directly contributed to the miners' deaths. Blankenship is chief executive of Virginia-based Massey Energy Company, which has been the target of multiple protests this year over mountaintop removal mining.

"The Sierra Club's agenda, of course, is to outlaw coal," said Massey spokesman Jeff Gillenwater, adding the company is proud of its relationship with WVU and its ability to fund scholarships.

But Smith disagreed, saying the Sierra Club wants to promote the use of renewable energy and to mine less coal, not outlaw it.

"It's a flat-out lie," he said.

The organization wants the chair, named for Bob Murray, to be named after the dead Crandall Canyon miners.

"Who are you going to honor, the rich executive involved in the scandal or the people who made the sacrifice and died in the tragedy?" Smith said.

Smith wants the University to publicly announce it won't receive money from those who have been criminally negligent. He thinks his demands are realistic.

"The University has all the control. They decide who they affiliate with, and they can certainly decide to not receive money from companies," he said. "We undoubtedly understand we're in a period of economic hardships, but it's not like our school needed it. School would still be running if they hadn't given it."

 

The AP contributed to this report.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

1 comments

Blue'n'Gold
Fri Dec 11 2009 09:09
As an employee of a very large, Fortune 300 company that works extensively with various energy companies including Massey Energy, I can understand and appreciate the influence companies such as these can have by, in our case, pledging their allegiance as customers or in the case of WVU, dolling out large, lump-sum donations. Ultimately, in my humble opinion, this donation and others like it are just more attempts by energy company executives to cover up their repititious and blatant disregard for the rules and regulations set forth by the Mine Safety and Health Administration and other regulatory agencies. As a native of West Virginia, I know all too well the impact these coal/energy companies have on our great state. They are both a blessing and a curse. Our state and its economy depend on coal and the substantial revenues, jobs, and other benefits that it generates. At the same time, the states suffers from the terrible impact mining has on the land. Mountain-top removal, acid mine drainage, deaths incurred in mine disasters, and so on, all have a horrific impact, each in its own way. Mining is one of the most dangerous professions in the world; deaths happen. Acid mine drainage will naturally occur because of the mining processes used. Mountain-top removal and surface mining are some of the most cost-effective methods for energy companies to extract this precious resource, therefore they will never stop doing it. However, it is not any of these factors that make the major energy corporations "bad." It is the fact that they are seemingly uncontrollable in regard to the safety standards and regulations they consistently choose not to follow. It would cost them more money than the massive fines they incur to follow the standards that would ensure a safer working environment for miners and a less-devestating impact on the our precious land. Therefore they choose to push the envelope; turn a blind eye to the terrible consequences of their utter negligence. Everyone is aware of what these companies get away with, including the decision-makers at WVU, in the WVU College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, and the WVU Foundation. It does not matter if the WVU Foundation is a seperate entity. They're still affiliated with WVU. They share WVU in their titles. Therefore, to many, they are one and the same and any decisions made by one will impact the other in the public eye. This is why donations such as the one granted by Mr. Murray and Mr. Blankenship should not be accepted by WVU or any of its affiliates. I do not denounce coal; my job depends on it. However, the actions of these corporations are typically so unethical they balance on the very ledge of scandalous. Energy corporations should be controlled. They should receive heavier fines and stiffer punishment for their egregious negligence in regard to safety standards and procedures. Until then, WVU should not accept any form of donation from such an ethically-questionable source.






log out