College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Congress shows it’s time to pull plug on bipartisanship

By Submission by Charles Corra

|

Published: Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Barack Obama’s successful presidential bid built a foundation on his intentions to "reach across party lines" and bring successful bipartisanship into a divided Washington political culture.

The thought of someone willing to bring the two major parties together and institute cooperation among them was too attractive for the American people to pass up.

Although Obama has successfully delivered on this promise in practice, it has not yielded the results anyone wanted.

Instead of boosting America forward with great legislative compromise, it has unfortunately stagnated Congress and led to a frustrating period of inaction.

Big agenda items such as health care reform remain on life support. Bipartisanship is threatening to pull the plug. The Republican Party has adjusted to its new role as the party of "no" due to its constant threat of filibustering any agenda item not meeting their every want.

Yet Obama still pushes for bipartisan Republican support. He needs to give up on them.

Bipartisanship, at its core, is a great method of uniting two conflicting groups. At its practice in the present day, however, it is hurting our country.

The constant pursuance of it by the Obama administration has resulted in nothing more than wasted time, vexation and the draining of American morale.

For bipartisanship to work, both parties must be willing to cooperate with each other, and this is where the Obama plan falls apart.

For example, a bill was recently introduced to Congress that would create a deficit task force to police and help control it. It garnered the co-sponsorship of numerous senators, including six Republicans.

The piece of legislation was introduced to Obama, who thought it seemed like a good idea and endorsed it. Once Republicans caught wind of this happening, the six particular ones mentioned removed their co-sponsorship.

Instead of working to improve the country, these representatives were merely out to score political points.

The bill failed to get the votes needed to pass.

The Republicans claim to want to reach across the aisle when confronted by the president or the media, but their actions speak louder than their words.

With organizations such as the Tea Party Movement, more or less a part of the Republican Party, spreading lies and hateful rhetoric about the president proves their actions contradict what they say.

This type of political tomfoolery is exactly why there is so much inaction and wasted time in Washington when real problems need solved.

Republicans may seem like they are the only ones to blame for the lack of problem solving in Congress, but Democrats are also to blame.

When Republicans force filibusters for anything they see unfit, this requires a supermajority vote of 60 to overturn, a number Democrats had for quite some time in the Senate.

The Republican base in congress can normally decide to vote unanimously against something and filibuster it, but Democrats are so diverse that they can’t decide on anything.

With blue dogs wanting special incentives to gain votes and the bleeding-heart liberals wanting to exile the blue dogs, the entire political process in Washington for the Democrats is an absolute mess.

Despite George W. Bush being a lame duck president, his disregard for bipartisanship led to him being able to push a lot of his agenda while he was in office – such as the Bush tax cuts.

Some of his policies worked against the well-being of the country, the principle still remains that he was able to advance his agenda without much help of the Democratic Party.

In today’s political arena, it seems evident Republicans don’t want anything to do with bipartisanship as long as the current president holds the office.

Because of this, the bipartisan dream is merely that – a dream.

Obama needs to rally his own party now before he brings the two bickering parties together if he hopes to deliver on his message of hope and change in America.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

7 comments

James P.
Fri Feb 12 2010 19:03
Okay so you just proven the point. It doesn't make sense what the republicans are doing. Many holes yes but the purpose of mentioning it is for it to be brought up as a contentious argument given the republicans recent tendency to not agree with democratic policies. To add to that you're nitpicking one bill where some republicans actually voted for. They are referred to as the party of no for reasons like placing holds on 63 nominations by the president (which they caved quickly once obama mentioned recess appointments), or wanting transparency in the healthcare debate then once a summit was proposed, saying it wasn't a good idea (i.e. john boehner). And Yes, back when gwb was president the democrats did the same thing with nominees and republicans threatened to get rid of the filibuster. Both democrats and republicans act childish. Its a broken system and the republicans constant filibustering is only exacerbating the problem and presenting the need for reform in the senate chamber.
Dave
Fri Feb 12 2010 17:59
James: I did not say there were people in the Tea Party that say stupid things. I don't think the Tea Party, as a whole, has lied about anything. Of course, there are elements in every group that lie/say stupid things/etc. Maybe I didn't make that point clear, my mistake.

And James, if the Republicans are the "party of no", how do you explain the 16 Republicans that voted for the task force? And as for the ones that switched their positions, I do not what their motives are.. but it wouldn't make sense that they just decided to go against it because Obama supports it. If they supported it in a bipartisan position to begin with, you would think they assumed the President would be behind it anyhow because of the support by democrats. The argument of the vote for this task force demonstrating that Republicans simply oppose what Obama supports has many, many holes.

James P.
Fri Feb 12 2010 15:02
Its merely pointing out how much of a coincidence it is that in a very short period of time they withdrew, and refuse to clarify that it wasn't because the president endorsed it.
And yes I did understand your post, I was pointing out that you were wrong.
The democrats probably do spread lies and hateful rhetoric, but that wasn't the issue. Sure it wasn't mentioned but you have failed to acknowledge that Tea Party people do spread hateful rhetoric and lies.
You first say that the tea party people dont use those things, then reverse that by saying that they might but democrats do too. Sure they do, everyone does. Democrats are just as guilty as anyone, but the difference is that the tea party is vocally and visually perpetuating these things
Dave
Fri Feb 12 2010 12:30
@James: "First of all Obama does push for bipartisanism, the democrats in congress are the ones screwing things up for him. The whole reason healthcare reform is failing is because he's piddled with republicans instead of just uniting democrats."

Do you not understand my response? I don't believe he supports bipartisanship. He says he does, but he does not act that way. When push comes to shove, he's ignored republican ideas.

"The point was not that democrats voted against the particular bill, it was that 6 REPUBLICANS WITHDREW THEIR SUPPORT BECAUSE OBAMA SUPPORTED IT."

Really? Do you know for sure that is why they withdrew their support? I've researched this issue a bit, cannot find any evidence from a neutral source stating this.

"And what lies and hateful rhetoric from tea partiers, are you serious?"

How about the lies and hateful rhetoric AGAINST the tea partiers? Is that to be ignored, as it was in this article and by you?

@OG: There are nutjobs in every political wing. The "birthers" are as ridiculous as the "truthers". Whats your point? I think in the article, the author is referring to hateful rhetoric coming from the mainstream republicans. If you want to define what they have said as hateful rhetoric, fine... but then you're going to have to label most of what the mainstream democrats have said about the right as hateful rhetoric as well. Shall we go down that path?

OG
Thu Feb 11 2010 21:48
:"What lies and hateful rhetoric?" LOL are you serious? oh wait, you probably don't believe they are lies. OBAMA WAS BORN IN KENYA! HE'S A SOCIALIST, A COMMUNIST, AND A NAZI. HE HATES AMURRICA.
James P.
Thu Feb 11 2010 19:01
@Dave
do you not understand the article?
First of all Obama does push for bipartisanism, the democrats in congress are the ones screwing things up for him. The whole reason healthcare reform is failing is because he's piddled with republicans instead of just uniting democrats.

The point was not that democrats voted against the particular bill, it was that 6 REPUBLICANS WITHDREW THEIR SUPPORT BECAUSE OBAMA SUPPORTED IT.
that shows they clearly don't want to work with dems.
And what lies and hateful rhetoric from tea partiers, are you serious? just look at their signs, comparisons of obama to hitler regardless of your political beliefs is just wrong.
the author of this article could have gone into some deeper explanation granted but still you're wrong

Dave
Thu Feb 11 2010 10:42
"The Republican Party has adjusted to its new role as the party of "no" due to its constant threat of filibustering any agenda item not meeting their every want."

Republican proposals aren't even given consideration. What other recourse do they have other than procedural moves to block bad legislation that the American people, by and large, do not want?

"Yet Obama still pushes for bipartisan Republican support. He needs to give up on them."

Has he really? By my count, he has largely ignored Republicans, just giving lip service to bipartisanship. The republicans have put forth numerous ideas for health care reform, which have been uniformly rejected without consideration by Obama and the democrats because they do not conform to their socialistic vision of universal healthcare.

"For example, a bill was recently introduced to Congress that would create a deficit task force to police and help control it. It garnered the co-sponsorship of numerous senators, including six Republicans.

The piece of legislation was introduced to Obama, who thought it seemed like a good idea and endorsed it. Once Republicans caught wind of this happening, the six particular ones mentioned removed their co-sponsorship."

What you conveniently fail to mention is that the vote in the Senate was supported by 16 Republicans and opposed by many democrats (29 I believe). With the Republican support, the democrats could have easily passed it had they not had many of their own reject it.

"With organizations such as the Tea Party Movement, more or less a part of the Republican Party, spreading lies and hateful rhetoric about the president proves their actions contradict what they say."

What lies and hateful rhetoric?

"Obama needs to rally his own party now before he brings the two bickering parties together if he hopes to deliver on his message of hope and change in America."

That does not even make sense! He promised to usher in a new era of politics, not divide the country even more!







log out