College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Editorial: J-Board should disqualify code violators

Published: Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, March 9, 2010

The West Virginia University Student Government Association Judicial Board should move to disqualify PIRATE Party Governor-elect Ahmad Alashi if it’s deemed an agent working on Alashi’s behalf used the Office of International Students and Scholars listserv to make an endorsement.

Currently, the Judicial Board is reviewing whether or not any SGA Elections Code violation affected the outcome of the recent election.

The e-mail was sent to more than 1,000 students.

With gubernatorial elections won by a handful of votes, it would be difficult to believe the e-mail didn’t play a factor in the vote.

According to the SGA Elections Code, it matters not whether the outcome of the election was affected but if a violation was committed.

Appendix Five, Section 1-J. states:

"Candidates are not allowed to place campaign materials on any University server or use any University-sponsored listserv. This includes, but is not limited to, telnet sites, gophers and WVU-hosted World Wide Web pages."

The international student listserv is University-sponsored.

Thus, if an agent of Alashi’s sent the e-mail, it was Alashi’s responsibility to prevent such actions, and the proper penalty should be dealt, as included in Article VII, Part H, Section D-1:

"If an agent of a candidate or candidates has committed a violation of this Election Code, and if the candidate(s) ordered the agent to commit the act in violation or knew of the agent’s act of violation and failed to take steps to prevent it, then the Judicial Board may view the act in violation as thought the candidates(s) personally committed the act. The Judicial Board thus may implicate the guilt to the candidate(s) and will impose the proper penalty or penalties ... "

If the five other individuals elected also committed violations, they too should be disqualified.

Where there is smoke, there is typically fire. If the action’s of individuals or supporters acting on their behalf altered the outcome of the SGA election, they should not be certified.

It’s time to move down the list and allow those candidates who came up short but have yet to violate the election code the opportunity to represent the student body.

Without certification, SGA remains in a state of limbo – no one is working in the interests of WVU students.

It’s time for the Judicial Board to make a decision. The University community is waiting.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

9 comments

Anonymous
Wed Mar 10 2010 18:11
I agree with the last comment! the DA is always stirring up controversy ....especially during election season! remember last year how many articles were written about the freaking signature sheets?! give it a break DA, find some other way to stir up trouble!
Anonymous
Wed Mar 10 2010 15:05
"I feel like this issue has been written about over the course of several issues now. While it was important the first time, the articles are getting to be repetitive and offer no new information about the issue."

Reminiscent of the DA's constant barrage of articles about fan behavior at basketball games, isn't it?
The DA's new slogan should be "manufacturing controversy since 1887".

Jason Butts
Wed Mar 10 2010 11:33
Everyone,

For those that are deeply concerned with student issues, I would like to remind you that the student body that not only are Jason and Whitney continuing their dedication to you, the student body still has 15 very qualified governors in office. The Zuccari-Peters administration is continuing their work and voicing student concerns until the new office-holders take their seats. The student body is not left unrepresented through this.

Anonymous
Wed Mar 10 2010 10:40
"If an agent of a candidate or candidates has committed a violation of this Election Code, and if the candidate(s) ordered the agent to commit the act in violation or knew of the agent’s act of violation and failed to take steps to prevent it, then the Judicial Board may view the act in violation as thought the candidates(s) personally committed the act. The Judicial Board thus may implicate the guilt to the candidate(s) and will impose the proper penalty or penalties ... "

Please someone come forward and prove that Alashi knew that and Agent of an Agent was going to send out these e-mails on the listserv! He already said he didn't know that they were sending out e-mails, no one has come forward to counter this statement, and even if they did it would still be hard to prove that he actually knew without an e-mail or recording from him. DROP IT ALREADY ... all this is doing is holding back student government from getting things done!

DA Sux
Wed Mar 10 2010 10:11
I love the sore losers need to move on line of thinking. So cheating winners get to win? Rules don't matter? In any case, the ends always justify the means? That is one heck of way to approach things and it will not serve the cheating winners very well when they enter the real world. In that world, of which I am a member, things like indictments, firing, terminal underemployment are the result of cheating. You don't get to just ignore it and move on.
Jaime
Wed Mar 10 2010 09:56
I feel like this issue has been written about over the course of several issues now. While it was important the first time, the articles are getting to be repetitive and offer no new information about the issue.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 10 2010 04:43
No one cares about any of this. Write about an issue that matters.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 10 2010 03:04
Right! How dare people point out election violations! How dare any of us follow rules!
Student
Wed Mar 10 2010 00:34
"It’s time to move down the list and allow those candidates who came up short but have yet to violate the election code the opportunity to represent the student body."

Move down the list? Almost every candidate in this election violated the code and only a select few have decided to be sore losers and file complaints while others chose to take the high road and try not to waste the student body's time but rather start working for the students they where elected to serve not waste countless hours of time worrying about irrelevant petty accusations.







log out