Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Editorial - Troops should also leave Afghanistan

Published: Sunday, October 23, 2011

Updated: Monday, October 24, 2011 00:10

President Barack Obama announced Friday that by year's end, all U.S. troops in Iraq will come home.

While this announcement serves as much-needed relief for many Americans, the question remains: Why aren't troops being pulled out of Afghanistan?

It is time for our government to stop wasting valuable resources abroad while they are needed at home.

Although President Obama announced that troops in Afghanistan will be out by December 2014, that isn't soon enough.

Too many Americans have been killed and many more injured, not to mention the amount of tax dollars spent during the wars.

According to the Center for Defense Information, the total cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars will have reached $1.29 trillion by the end of this year – enough is enough.

Some argue that pulling out of Afghanistan would be disrespectable to the brave soldiers who have lost their lives in the conflict. But, now Osama bin Laden, the man responsible for the 9/11 attacks has been killed, what other reason do we have to remain there?

Sure, there may be terrorists in the region who are training and planning future attacks, but spending billions of dollars a year on a "war on terror" is just not a feasible way to stop them.

By putting our country in massive debt and weakening the financial stability of our nation, the terrorists have achieved a victory in some way.

It is now time to focus on the home front.

Even if democracy could be forced on other countries (which it can't), it isn't the responsibility of the U.S. to ensure it. We cannot police the world.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai recently stated that if the U.S. and Pakistan were to go to war, the Afghani government would support Pakistan. President Karzai's comment blatantly tells the world of his distaste for American presence in Afghanistan.

If the Afghans don't want us there, and the majority of Americans don't want us there, then we should not be there.

Waiting until 2014 to pull out our troops is unacceptable. The conflict in Afghanistan is already America's longest war.

Let the Afghan people govern and police themselves.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

Sarah Leifheit
Tue Oct 25 2011 12:24
Well said Jim.

Cowgirl Tina- Really? Your statement didn't do anything but prove YOUR level of understanding (more likely the lack there of) of the, or any, international policy. You just attacked the DA staff, as pathetic as they do seem to be, but you did not provide ANY logic for your argument. Your ignorance is farther proven by your butchering of English grammar and the lack of eloquence that you display.

Jim did address most of the problems with this article but the lack of support from Karzai is left dangling. Yes, this is kind of a slap in the face to America with the support that we have provided Afghanistan. If you look at it from Afghanistan's perspective, one can almost make sense of it. Think about it; you can either support your next door neighbor or you can support the mayor of the town who is extremely disconnected from your needs but continues to line your pockets dispite his growing debt. If we go to war with Pakistan it is bound to leak over to Afghanistan. Karzai is just trying to do well by his people, how can you fault him for that? With the growing debt in America, countries like Afghanistan have to wonder when the catch 22 is going to hit and they will have to pay the piper.

America has done great things for Afghanistan. I think that there is still more to do when it comes to stabilizing Afghanistan to be strong enough to prevent another Taliban uprising. They are still killing people with American presence, it would be much worse if we weren't there. Are we, as Americans, ready for Afghanistan to go back to being a Taliban run country? You might say: "Well I don't care. I will be long gone". What about your children or your grandchildren? Personally, I would rather stay there a little longer and complete what needs done so my future generations don't have to deal with it. I don't want them to be in the next tower to go down if the Taliban regains control of Afghanistan. Yes, a lot of this is hypothetical. I can't tell the future, all I have is a little hope that America can pull this off and finish this mission.

Jim Stevens
Mon Oct 24 2011 18:37
Cowgirl Tina:

You come off as ignorant and one-sided as does the DA Staff, who prepared the poorly-written drivel about which you complain. Your reasoning seems to be that their opposition to American involvement in the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan is directly correlated to, and therefore caused by, their left/liberal slant. This completely ignores the growing anti-war sentiment among centrists and conservatives.

ALL OF YA:

The mission in Afghanistan, contrary to what the above opinion implies, was never to kill Osama bin Laden. Some consider that a bonus, and others (like me) consider it a tragic lapse of justice. Regardless, his capture and/or killing (execution, murder, whatever you care to call it) was a marginal consideration. Rather, the mission was to end Taliban support of Al Qaeda and related terrorist activity worldwide.

This isn't so simple as one sentence might imply, however. For instance, that includes the implied task of securing the nation of Afghanistan in the interim, while it establishes a respectable government (hasn't happened yet), and control of its own borders and internal security (DEFINITELY hasn't happened yet). Why does it imply these tasks? Because the Taliban had been in charge of the country for many years, between the end of the Soviet campaign there and the beginning of the NATO one. In fact, not so long ago, the Taliban made international news for becoming a threat to parts of Iran along their shared border.

Unfortunately, nation-building entails national security service in the interim. And it is an absolute necessity when undertaking a military campaign of the magnitude of Operation Enduring Freedom. This is dirty, expensive business. It takes a long-term commitment.

It might help to think of OEF as cancer treatment. What we've heard from many war opponents is that the surgery alone was plenty, and it's up to the patient to recover. What yet others have suggested is that non-invasive, holistic treatment alone should do the trick--we simply needed to give it more time. And while there is a relatively small 5-year survival rate for this particular cancer, the few successful cases have been realized from an approach that involves immediate surgery followed by long-term chemotherapy. It costs a lot of money, and takes a lot of effort by a great many medical professionals. Most importantly, the patient himself must be absolutely committed to getting better.

Now, apply that example to the case of OEF. Unfortunately, the initial operation to remove the tumor wasn't able to remove the whole thing--small pieces of it remained, and have since continued growing. Initially, the dosage applied in chemotherapy was too small to be effective, and now that it's been raised to an appropriate level, it's still difficult to subdue the small tumor fragments that remain. Of course, it SHOULD work given enough time and the willingness of both the patient and his doctors.

Of course, should the doctors throw-in the towel, the tumors will eventually overtake the patient again. Another surgery is out of the question. We can keep nursing the patient along, albeit far more slowly and at far greater cost than what we've ever been comfortable with, or we can put him in fate's hands and he will SURELY succumb.

If you advocate the immediate and complete withdrawal of American military personnel from Afghanistan, then be ready to have the blood of the many Afghan men and women (among them, more than a few are my friends) who will surely perish in the ensuing madness on YOUR hands. If you advocate sticking it out longer than is necessary for the nation to become stable and respectable, then prepare to have my brothers and sisters in-arms' blood on YOUR hands.

There is a balance to be had here. That's something that, more and more, it seems to me, our political "leaders" (I use that term VERY loosely in describing anyone working in the US political system today) and their followers are unwilling to accept. It's all about Veruca Salt these days ("Don't care how, I want it NOW!") in political discussions. And the military men and women of our nation are the ones to suffer the effects of our dysfunction.

Grow up...

Cowgirl Tina
Mon Oct 24 2011 12:03
To The DA Staff,
you ask "Why aren't troops being pulled out of Afghanistan?" If you jerkoffs had any grasp of international policy before you wrote this piece of garbage, you would now that the reason is that the job has not been finished in Afghanistan. This "editorial" confirms my belief that the entire DA editorial staff consists of far left, anti-Americans extremists.






log out