College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

‘Family Guy’ creators and Sarah Palin do a disservice to satire

Published: Sunday, February 21, 2010

Updated: Sunday, February 21, 2010 20:02

The fact "Family Guy" raised the ire of Sarah Palin seems inevitable.

Last week, the show featured an episode in which teenager Chris goes on a date with a classmate, Ellen, who has Down syndrome.

Actress Andrea Fay Friedman, who voiced the character, is also afflicted with the disease.

In a quick side-joke, Chris asks Ellen what her parents do and Ellen replies, "My dad is an accountant, and my mom is the former governor of Alaska."

The joke refers to Palin, whose youngest son, Trig, has Down syndrome.

Of course, Palin was upset, calling the show’s writers "cruel" and "coldhearted."

While Friedman and "Family Guy" creator Seth MacFarlane assert that the joke was on Palin and not her son, Palin has a legitimate reason to be offended.

Her son’s disease was still used as a way to attack her. Down syndrome wasn’t the target of ridicule here (some have praised the episode for Ellen as a normal teenager), but it was the vehicle for a cheap shot.

Although "Family Guy" brings back fond memories of my high school days, I have thoroughly hated the show for last couple years.

And I almost always pass on the reruns of the older episodes in favor of better options.

For all the show’s attempts to be edgy, it has no satiric value.

On other adult cartoons like "South Park" and "The Boondocks," for example, potentially offensive content is used humorously to make serious and thought-provoking points about our society.

These shows have enough substance to justify their content. "Family Guy" does not.

It did not make any point about Palin or America. The joke was nothing but a low blow.

But that’s what I’ve come to expect from "Family Guy." The writers throw jokes at the wall and see what will stick for a short, cheap laugh.

Nothing on the show has ever been deep or thought-provoking, and the episodes that do cover current issues or events only provide shallow pandering to people who have the same mind-set as the writers.

I like dumb shows sometimes but not ones that try to be smart and fail.

"South Park" creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone aren’t always the kings of subtlety, but MacFarlane makes them look like Woody Allen.

Palin was right to call out the MacFarlane crew for having no heart behind its criticisms and therefore, no real claim to satire.

But other recent events suggest that Palin doesn’t actually understand satire either.

At the beginning of this month, Palin called for the firing of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel after he said that liberal groups wanting to run health care-related ads against Democratic legislators were "f---ing retarded."

There’s really no defense for comparing those who disagree with you to the mentally challenged, right?

Palin basically answered "wrong" to this question when she defended Rush Limbaugh for saying, "our politically correct society is acting like some giant insult’s taken place by calling a bunch of people who are retards ‘retards,’" as the beginning of an insensitive tirade.

In an interview with FOX News’ Chris Wallace, Palin said Limbaugh’s statements were acceptable because he was "using satire" to shed light on Emanuel’s remark.

Palin said she "did not hear Rush Limbaugh calling a group of people whom he did not agree with ‘f-ing retards.’"

As seen above, he did, minus an expletive.

So what makes Limbaugh different from Emanuel? In Palin’s eyes, it’s the fact that she politically agrees with Limbaugh.

Palin and MacFarlane are, in many ways, binary opposites.

Palin is a conservative who emphasizes traditionalism and religious values (as they are generally considered), while MacFarlane is a liberal and an atheist.

In actuality, they are not so different.

Both make it clear they see their own views as what people’s normal thought patterns should be and opposite views as irrational or unintelligent.

Both are willing to use crass or rude expressions when going on the offensive against those opposite views.

Both are ready to defend their actions by saying "it was just a joke" or "they’re only offended because they didn’t get it" when criticized by the other party.

And both have thousands upon thousands of fans to encourage them to be this way.

Comedic satire should be fueled by the purpose to present an issue in a way that is accessible because of its humor while not understating the complexity of the subject.

The Palin-MacFarlane method is to use humor as a crutch in personal quibbles.

We should expect more from political figures and entertainers.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

39 comments

Med. defs response
Mon Feb 22 2010 11:26
Dear Anonymous--Thank you for assuming so much about my life. I do know someone with Down. I am a physician with a 15 year-old son who has Down Syndrome. He has been a blessing to my life and I love him very much. I am part of support groups for other parents with Down children and we rejoice in their successes and work hard to bring awareness to the rich lives that they lead.
But a genetic disorder is STILL a disease and I don't get offended when someone confuses the definition of syndrome and disease and refers to Down as a disease, because, as I stated, genetic disorders are diseases provided they have understood and set etiological causes. It is purely an issue of medical definitions. Just as I do not get upset by someone referring to my type 1 diabetes as a disease, which it is, I do not get upset when lay people confuse syndrome with disease and call Down a disease. Attaching emotional labels to medical definitions is counterproductive and distracts from the important issues of increasing awareness of Down syndrome and the rich lives that our children with Down lead.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 22 2010 11:20
Copying a definition from Wikipedia does not make you an authority on the subject of Down Syndrome. The person commenting that has a sibling with Down syndrome obviously had dealt with it through a family members' struggles. They, if anyone, have a right to be upset over the wording in this article because it touches their life daily. Medical defs--you said yourself that the labeling of Down syndrome as a disease is incorrect. I think that is the point that other people are trying to get across, too. Mislabeling Down syndrome does nothing but show the ignorance of the writer. I'm sure no harm or disrespect was intended--but that's what happened.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 22 2010 11:12
Medical defs---you obviously don't know someone with Down Syndrome--maybe then you would be more sympathetic to the outrage displayed over the fact that the author is calling a person with Down Syndrome "diseased." I would never tell my brother that he had a "disease." Hope I cleared that up.
Medical defs
Mon Feb 22 2010 11:05
A genetic disorder is a still a disease. ANY condition with a known etiological cause and described symptoms is a disease. A clustering of symptoms with unknown or varying causes is a syndrome. Down Syndrome can have varying genetic mutations (translocation of chromosomes vs duplication of chromosomes, for instance) and it is unclear exactly how protein products altered by trisomy 21affect function to cause Down symptoms. Based on these criteria, Down Syndrome is not a disease, but NOT because it is a genetic disorder.
COMMUNICABLE diseases are diseases that can be spread from one person to another and INFECTIOUS diseases are diseases that are acquired through infection with a substance--such as a bacteria or fungus. Not all infectious diseases are communicable.
So, calling Down Syndrome a disease is incorrect but only because of the rules of medical nomenclature, not because genetic disorders are not diseases or because the word "disease" always implies communicability. I am often accused by colleagues of being politically correct to the point of extremes, but even I feel getting offended because the writer calls Down a disease is taking it too far. Hope I cleared that up.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 22 2010 10:49
My little brother has Down Syndrome. He is in no way "afflicted with a disease." He is one of the most intelligent, compassionate people that I know. The author of this article, on the other hand, IS afflicted with a disease---called ignorance. Do yourself a favor and check the FACTS before you make hurtful, baseless claims.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 22 2010 10:25
I find this article shallow and pedantic
Anonymous
Mon Feb 22 2010 09:58
I can't believe the author referred to Friedman as being, "afflicted with the disease." How ignorant and insensitive. I guess Palin will be coming after you next for being so hateful towards those with a GENETIC DISORDER. It's not a disease, you can't catch it.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 22 2010 06:43
the fact that someone as unqualified as sarah palin was elected should remind us that each citizen in a democracy has a responsibility to look hard at issues and actually do some homework. what we are seeing today is the result of laziness and complacency of/by american citizens. when people think it's okay to vote based on a whim or a superficial desire, these types of people will inevitably get elected. other examples include ronald reagan and arnold the terminator. we need people like seth to point out how stupid some people really are.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 22 2010 06:25
We should expect more from your article.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 22 2010 05:01
what a pointless article. no one cares how sarah palin feels
Palin's opinionion is worse than the judgement of a drunk dyxpraxic
Mon Feb 22 2010 04:45
You may as well complain, that someone called Peter Griffin is autistic in real life or that Peter Griffin is based on me a dyxpraxic fat guy with brown hair and a Catholic background (Peter Griffin the Family Guy characted has poor judgement, short attention span... They did a whole episode on that and I wasn't offended
Peter Griffin
Mon Feb 22 2010 04:31
EVERYONE KNOWS THE BIRD IS THE WORD
Not Peter Griffin
Mon Feb 22 2010 04:29
Shut up Pailin, the joke was aimed at you. I think refering to Obama's health paln as a "death panel" is an insult to Britain. Love Family Guy, Palin needs to lighten up
Anonymous
Mon Feb 22 2010 01:14
hahahaha this show was merely a way to prove Sarah Palin as a hypocrite.
Sarah Palin goes around the states saying "oh In AMERICA we have freedom to say anything on media, so we are better than everyone else..." and when Family guy does exactly what she has been telling Americans, she flips out. Lolololol.... Palin biggest joke ever.
Anonymous
Sun Feb 21 2010 22:33
Imagine that, a joke being said in a comedy show... South Park hasn't been funny for about 6 seasons now mainly on accountant of it trying too hard to be satirical and forgetting to be funny. Family Guy has not failed like that.
Anonymous
Sun Feb 21 2010 22:33
It was great to see a person with Down syndrome portrayed as so domineering. I thought the line in question helped define the character's personality by showing she could lie with the purpose of putting on airs with such ease. Of course the character did not represent Trig, she was a teenage girl who looked like the actress voicing her. Anyone assuming it did represent Trig does him a disservice by letting his Down syndrome be the sum of his identity.
Anonymous
Sun Feb 21 2010 22:24
You make it sound like she's contagious..."afflicted with the disease." Come on, you are doing an intelligent, successful woman [Friedman[ a disservice.
Anonymous
Sun Feb 21 2010 22:21
Fay Friedman is not afflicted with a disease--it is a genetic disorder.
Anonymous
Sun Feb 21 2010 22:05
"...I thought the line "I am the daughter of the former governor of Alaska" was very funny. I think the word is "sarcasm". In my family we think laughing is good. My parents raised me to have a sense of humor and to live a normal life. My mother did not carry me around under her arm like a loaf of French bread the way former Governor Palin carries her son Trig around looking for sympathy and votes."
--Andrea Fay Friedman






log out