Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Meghan McCain’s interview gives new meaning to ridiculous

Published: Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, September 1, 2010 23:09

McCain

AP

Meghan McCain might have possibly insulted the intelligence of reasonable people everywhere during her interview with Bill O'Reilly Tuesday night.

She appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on Fox News to discuss the release of her memoir "Dirty Sexy Politics," a tell-all about her time spent on the campaign trail with her father Senator John McCain during the 2008 presidential election.

Known for partaking in her father's ideology of "straight talk," McCain spoke candidly in reference to her disapproval of President Barack Obama and his administration.

When asked how she felt about Obama's first 18 months in office, McCain told O'Reilly that "he is doing a terrible job" and that she "disagrees with 85 to 90 percent" of what Obama has done so far.

Then adding insult to injury, O'Reilly asked McCain what grade she would give Obama on a scale from "A" to "F." McCain said he deserved a "C" or a "C-minus."

I believe it is safe to say that McCain is in no position to give Obama a "C" on anything.

Then, lending even more comic relief to the conversation, McCain discussed her feelings about GOP princess Sarah Palin. She explained that they don't see eye-to-eye due to the fact that McCain is more "socially liberal" and Palin is a "traditional conservative."

For some reason, McCain believes that supporting gay marriage is the only requirement to be considered socially liberal. She needs to take some time off from her book tour and do some reading on liberal thinking.

It isn't just about standing up for an oppressed minority; it is a mindset and requires a social conscious that she clearly lacks.

McCain went on to compliment Palin, stating that she isn't the demanding, attention-seeking diva some people think she is, saying that Palin is a woman who knows what she wants and has been preparing to be vice president her entire life.

I am curious to know what exactly McCain meant by "preparing."

If Sarah Palin has been preparing to be vice president, the people at Webster's dictionary need to change the definition of the word "prepare" immediately.

After her tirade about Obama ended and she finished with her love-hate diatribe about Palin, McCain made one of the most blatant contradictions I have ever heard. O'Reilly asked her what she expected in a president, and she said she's looking for a leader "to inspire her generation."

Then seconds later, O'Reilly asked her what, if anything, she liked about Obama. Without a moment's pause she responded "his ability to inspire and motivate young people."

If that isn't contradictory, I don't know what is. Regardless of how people feel about Obama, our country hasn't had a more influential and inspirational leader since Bobby Kennedy or Dr. King.

So again, I am curious to know what she meant when she said inspire, because Obama has definitely inspired the youth of the nation in a way that no one else was able to do.

Everyone has times when they slip up and forget something they said in the midst of a passionate conversation, but that isn't the kind of statement that should just evaporate from your mind within seconds.

It seems that McCain just says the first thing that comes to her mind, and it usually ends up being nonsense.

Thank goodness she said she'd never run for office because we have enough politicians speaking without thinking.

McCain stated proudly that she is a Republican and that the GOP needs to incorporate some "sexiness" into their policies. Considering there are people in this country who are homeless, hungry and unemployed, you'd think that "sexiness" would be the last thing a supposed liberal Republican would be concerned with.

Obama and his administration aren't perfect. Far from it. They have made a lot of mistakes both publicly and internally. But at least they are trying to make things better for the people in this country in need of help.

Even though she appeared on "The O'Reilly Factory" to have a lighthearted conversation about her memoir, she is a figure in the Republican Party and, if she was as liberal as she claims to be, you'd think that she would have used that interview as an opportunity to shed light on something more important.

But she took it as an opportunity to slam Obama and talk about power and sex.

Just like other political parties, Democrats say a lot they don't mean. However, the day I hear a Democrat stand up and say that their party is in desperate need of "sexiness," will be the day that elephants fly.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Anonymous
Mon Oct 18 2010 15:27
What can I say. Meghan is at 26 a light weight. She may have followed daddy around on the campaign trail...so what? Her valley girl voice just turns me off. If she is to be taken serious she need to go to a voice coach and get her vocal act together. Her comments on O'Donnell........would love to have a witch in the Senate to put some hoo--doo on this bunch of attorneys. Go Tea Party. As for her lack of experience; that is PRECISELY what makes her an attractive candidate. Meghan, head to the beauty salon and talk it over with your nail tech on what to do with your voice - yikes.
Anonymous
Thu Sep 2 2010 08:35
"Meghan McCain might have possibly insulted the intelligence of reasonable people everywhere during her interview with Bill O’Reilly Tuesday night."

Actually, you insulted all of our intelligences by writing this article. About par for the course for your writing, it's about as terrible, hateful, and uninsightful as most of the other articles posted here.

Anon
Thu Sep 2 2010 08:19
Didn’t see Ms. McCain. But, I‘ll just assume you’d give a much better interview. Being inspired happens frequently to young people . . . of all political backgrounds. Both patriots and terrorists are inspired by something. For example, Timothy McVeigh believed himself to be a patriot . . . but his misguided inspiration clearly made him a terrorist. So, what really matters are the concepts that inspire them. It’s evident that the inspirational speeches that inspired some citizens of our great nation in 2008 were not in our collective best interest and a large majority are beginning to regret their participation in that kind of “change”. So, you will see elephants fly . . . right back into the White House - November 2012. And it will be sexy.
joeedh
Thu Sep 2 2010 00:53
I absolutely love your liberal, open-minded tolerance.

Why, I imagine those minorities you speak of must kneel and kiss your ring every time you personally hand them their bread and cheese for the day.

"Thank goodness she said she’d never run for office because we have enough politicians speaking without thinking."

"Even though she appeared on "The O’Reilly Factory" to have a lighthearted conversation about her memoir, she is a figure in the Republican Party and, if she was as liberal as she claims to be, you’d think that she would have used that interview as an opportunity to shed light on something more important."

Look up "groupthink" someday, how highly oppressive it is. Or talk to the many gay/bi people screwed by the Gay Left. Or the many black people screwed by populist black culture. Or women screwed by feminist radicals. Or sexually abused men verbally abused by those same radicals.

You aren't nearly as liberal as you think. You are a social conservative; your "traditions" are simply newer.







log out