Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Rise of a third (or fourth) party will better the political landscape

Published: Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 23:11

Tea

Ann Heisenfelt/The Daily Athenaeum

A Tea Party member, who calls himself both George Washington and Major States Manship, left, shows his book to another Tea Party Patriot as members of the Tea Party Patriots hold an election night party in Washington, Tuesday.

The United States is taking leaps and bounds toward a more effective and self-regulating political system even if it is going unnoticed.

The bipartisan system that has constipated the political processes of this country for the greater part of its existence is beginning to change a little each year, but this year more than any other in the past.

The changes taking place in the United States are very important and should force voters in every state to look beyond the party of their parents and the normative party lines seemingly etched in stone from generations before.

The abandonment of a strict left or right political system will instigate political creativity, foster better political cooperation and ultimately benefit the American people.

For the past several elections, candidates who are not typical of one party or another have started popping up all over the map.

Independents in the Northeast, and now Tea Partiers are beginning to demand respect from the parties who are used to having one enemy and categorizing everyone as either for "us" or against "us."

As a note, this argument is neither an endorsement nor condemnation of the tea party. That is not what is important. What is important is the emergence of an alternative party, even though the party does seem to emerge nearly in its entirety from one of the original two parties.

This midterm election has shown the willingness voters have to elect third party candidates.

Such is the case in Kentucky where Rand Paul, the tea party's prince, if you will, was triumphant, calling in 160,000 more votes than his Democratic challenger.

Rand Paul's father, Ron Paul, is attributed as the founder of the tea party movement in 2007.

Florida elected Marco Rubio, a tea party candidate. This is even more interesting because running with the Republican nomination, Rubio and the second highest vote getter, Charlie Crist, an Independent, both fall outside of the normative party structure. Together the two pulled in 79 percent of the vote in Florida.

As with any movement, the tea party has had a few shortcomings.

The Democrats, whom they do not side with, gained control of the Senate because of the failure of two candidates to perform in their own elections.

Tea party candidates Christine O'Donnell and Sharon Angle both failed to win in key races in Delaware and Nevada, respectively, allowing for a Democratic majority.

While these losses may hurt the party, let us not lose sight of the bigger picture.

It is asinine to believe the political beliefs of an entire nation can be lumped into two aged categories.

The advent of parties that do not follow the conventional left or right of center dichotomy will lead to systemic changes and benefits that will be reaped by the entire nation.

This will make policymaking more difficult, but more good will come from the increased labor to bear the same policy fruit.

Lawmakers will be forced to create policy that provides more good to more people, wasteful pork and party back-scratching will ebb, and lawmakers will have the opportunity to take advantage of a greater diversity of ideas in their policymaking process.

With the diversity of representation present in a system estranged from the current bipolar political system, larger problems can be solved through a greater thought process and the fostering of cooperation across all former party lines.

This system, while neither Utopian nor perfect, will bolster the successes and minimize the shortcomings already present in the United States. The elimination of an "us vs. them" element within the political arena will far outweigh the loss of structure that outrages those in power within the current system.

Consequently, the election of Independents and tea party members in this midterm season is the starting point for an American change that will shake our political system to its core.

From the rubble of the existing structure will rise a more flexible and fluid system, able to adapt to the needs and desires of their constituents and create policy that is not only better for the people but is better policy for all of the people.

Though knowing what this new system will look like, it is undoubtedly on its way.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

8 comments

lpwv.org
Thu Nov 4 2010 16:44
"The Tea Party is by no means a third party..it's just a gimmick. These so-called Tea Party candidates are all Republicans. "

Quite false. The Tea Party was actually started by libertarians in Chicago as a response to the taxes. The Republicans jumped on board and tried to hijack it when it was profitable. They are slowly falling off as Tea Party candidates are damaging the GOP establishment candidates.

But as for the article, you are writing a story about third parties and didn't even mention the alternate candidates that ran right here in this state. In the 44th District there was a libertarian and independent on the ballot. There were two non-traditional candidates for US Senate.

A viable third party already exists and it's called the Libertarian Party. It offers the best choice for everyone.

Anonymous
Thu Nov 4 2010 16:00
"Ignorant like climate change deniers"

Who is denying that the climate changes? It is constantly changing. It has been since before humans existed and will continue to change long after we're gone. I don't think anyone denies that, I certainly haven't heard anyone in the Tea Party deny that the climatic patterns of the Earth are constantly changing.

Cowboy Chris
Thu Nov 4 2010 13:00
I got an idea for a fourth party. I will be called The DA Staff Party. It will include Communists, Socialists, and Progressives. They will want to re-disribute wealth and take away our guns, have gay marriage, and abolish coal mining. We can ride around in wind and solar powered cars.
Quill
Thu Nov 4 2010 12:33
Every movement has its fringe elements. Not taking the Tea Party seriously and just spitting venom at them proves the desperation of the accuser.

Good column overall AJ.

Anonymous
Thu Nov 4 2010 11:57
Ignorant like climate change deniers, or ignorant like religious flakes who think the earth is only 6,000 years old, or ignorant like glenn beck and his cadre of keyboard commandoes?
Anonymous
Thu Nov 4 2010 10:33
I wish someone (perhaps Chelsea Fuller) would write an article on how ignorant you sound when you call someone a "teabagger". It immediately causes one to dismiss whatever you are saying, even if it is a valid point. Makes you sound like a Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow wannabe.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 4 2010 08:51
"This system, while neither Utopian nor perfect, will bolster the successes and minimize the shortcomings already present in the United States. The elimination of an "us vs. them" element within the political arena will far outweigh the loss of structure that outrages those in power within the current system."

Have you ever actually listened to what the teabaggers are saying? It's 100% us-vs.-them rhetoric.

Anonymous
Thu Nov 4 2010 00:48
I can't decide which is more poorly written, this column or the one you wrote about the mosque. The Tea Party is by no means a third party..it's just a gimmick. These so-called Tea Party candidates are all Republicans.






log out