Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Tea Party’s rise fueled by fear-mongering and lies

Published: Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 23:09

Barack Hussein Obama was sworn in as the 44th president of the United States of America on Jan. 20, 2009.

This day marked the beginning of a disturbing break from the ideals our Founding Fathers built this great country upon. It was the day our presidency was hijacked by a man who managed to hoodwink the masses with his false message of "hope" and "change."

This is a man we know less about than any president in our history. He has not even presented his birth certificate to prove his citizenship, probably because he was born in Kenya.

This Kenyan heritage, coupled with his childhood schooling in a Madrassa, is probably why he sympathizes with the Muslim terrorists who seek to impose Shariah law on our people.

Obama's ideology could best be described as a mixture of socialism, fascism, Nazism, Islamic fundamentalism and Black Liberation Theology.

It is this radical ideology that has lead to the continuous erosion of our freedoms that began when Obama took office.

This characterization of President Barack Obama is the fictional narrative that has fueled the rise of the reactionary, far-right wing of the Republican Party, better known as the Tea Party.

The Tea Party was born out of the anger of many on the right stemming from the perception that Obama is a radical whose agenda is to destroy the America they know and love.

They not only disagree with Obama's policies, but they view him as a threat to the freedoms that have set this country apart for the past several centuries.

In the wake of a string of electoral victories for Tea Party candidates in the Republican primaries, the Republican Party has continued to shift further and further to the right, and these conspiracy theories and fantasies about Obama are becoming more prominent.

According to a March Harris Poll survey, 57 percent of Republicans falsely believe Obama is a Muslim, 67 percent believe he is a socialist, 45 percent believe that he was not born in the U.S., 38 percent believe he is "doing many of the things that Hitler did" and 24 percent believe he "may be the Antichrist."

These troubling numbers highlight the advent of the notion that it's acceptable to debate facts. For example, despite the fact that Obama's birth certificate is available online for all to see, there is a sizable number of Americans who "believe" that he was born in Kenya.

Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. That's an unequivocal fact. You can disagree with Obama's policies, but you cannot "believe" that he was born in Kenya because that's factually untrue.

You can disagree with Obama's policies and still accept the fact that he is a Christian and not the African-Muslim spawn of Adolf Hitler.

It's amazing how many people have fallen prey to this concerted effort on the right to mis-characterize Obama as a foreign, un-American, fascist with a desire to destroy this country.

In the words of Newt Gingrich, Obama is "so outside our comprehension that only if you understand Kenyan anticolonial behavior can you begin to piece (him) together."

Gingrich is not alone. Whether it's a Facebook post by Sarah Palin about Obama's desire to "pull the plug on grandma," or a maniacal Glenn Beck rant comparing Obama to Hitler, high-ranking conservatives are actively engaged in this smear-campaign, and unfortunately, it has resonated with a large number of people.

Rather than presenting reasoned arguments about why the Democratic Party's policies are hurting America, they are shoring up fear and hatred of Obama and labeling Democrats as socialists.

Why wasn't George W. Bush called a socialist when his administration oversaw a huge expansion of the federal government's power, including an expansion of Medicare?

How can President Obama be trying to appease the terrorists when he ordered an escalation of the war in Afghanistan and initiated a covert war against al-Qaida in Pakistan?

These accusations are disproved by reality. The same people who now accuse Obama of being a "secret Muslim" were complaining about his ties to Jeremiah Wright's church before the election.

The same people who are screaming that they "want to take their country back" because of Obama's socialist stimulus and health care bills had nothing to say about George W. Bush's expansion of Medicare or the stimulus package he signed.

Thomas Jefferson once said that "whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government." Election season is upon us, and midterm elections are right around the corner.

It's time for everyone to calm down, put down their pitchforks and make informed decisions about whom to vote for.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

22 comments

Kenny
Fri Oct 22 2010 10:57
Obama began his political career in the living room of two domestic terrorists in Billy Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. Enough said.
Mdawg
Wed Oct 6 2010 12:40
people get too caught up in the left/right thing. The Democrats and Republicans are almost identical on most of the important issues like expanding the size and scope of government, spending money they don't have, entangling us in the affairs of other nations. They play on people's emotions with things like Abortion, Unemployment etc.. Govt. is one of the most inefficient things ever, if a private corp. was run like our govt. is run then they would be bankrupt.

I don't really consider myself a democrat or republican, honestly I think anyone who blindly aligns themselves with either party is just a sheep. People need to stop regurgitating their ideological beliefs from stupid shows on CNN and Fox News. Make up your own mind based on the best information available to you...

Well I could go on and on with my rant... but I have to get back to work!

Anon
Thu Sep 30 2010 12:46
You know, the author could have written a very similar article 2 years ago: "Obama's rise based on fear-mongering and lies".
Cowboy Chris
Thu Sep 30 2010 11:22
The Democratic party is fueled by fear mongering and lies. They call anyone that dislikes Obama because of his policies a racist. This implies that they only voted for him because he's black and don't care that he's clueless and stupid. They are the racists. The Democrats.
BSME Alumni
Thu Sep 30 2010 10:35
That’s not he same you giggling fool. What you’re trying to compare is a lifestyle preference to a race/nationality identification. IF DADT is repealed, the logistics of it’s equitable implementation is really the issue. How will it be done and what will it cost. Make no mistake it will be very expensive. Regardless, your military will comply with the law, whatever it is. I’ll be PC and call it different standard of behavior, but a standard none the less.
DADT
Thu Sep 30 2010 10:18
Lol are you referring to the same "united" military that kicks out people for their sexual preferences?
BSME Alumni
Thu Sep 30 2010 06:36
Civics & American Pluralism? Really? You’ve bought it hook line and sinker. Diversity programs divide. We should be teaching UNITY and standards of behavior. Our goal should be sharing and celebrating our likenesses of being and becoming American. Our military is a shining example of this. No where in American society is true equality more exemplified – Unity and common standard of behavior. People who know our history, like Nell Irvin Painter [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nell_Irvin_Painter] openly state that focusing on our similarities rather than our differences is the key to a strong America. Yes, that old and out dated concept of the melting pot is really what makes America hum. Immigrants of old struggled to fit in and identified themselves singularly as Americans. From my perspective (and Ms. Painter would disagree), routinely hyphenating anyone’s Americanism degrades their status and show a lack of commitment. It is really enables discrimination. An American is an American - shared privileges, shared responsibility. Individual heritage is a personal status that really only relates to individual customs and is not relevant to an individuals contributions or short comings as citizens. Was George Washington identified as a British-American President? If BHO is the best or worst President in our history, is it really necessary to qualify that statement by hyphenating his Americanism?
Cowboy Chris
Wed Sep 29 2010 19:52
Millions of Jobs have been lost to China because of Obamas policies, the high wages unions demand, and the business taxes in the United States. Employers are laying off employees because they can't afford healthcare. Businesses aren't hiring becase of all the taxes the stupid Demorats want. go Tea Party
Anonymous
Wed Sep 29 2010 16:51
Did you know that the president is the one who creates jobs! for example, when Microsoft wants to hire a new employee, they hvae to ask Obama personally if they can hire that person! Same thing for layoffs ! it's ALL Obama's fault!
Mountaineer
Wed Sep 29 2010 12:43
You have candidates like Christine O'donnel and you wonder why everyone trashes the Tea Party. She just got caught lying again about her educational background and that's hardly surprising. The Tea Party is a joke and all you fools who are getting swept up by it need to go back to high school and pay closer attention in your civics classes, particularly the unit about American pluralism.
Anonymous
Wed Sep 29 2010 08:55
"The Tea Party was born out of the anger of many on the right stemming from the perception that Obama is a radical whose agenda is to destroy the America they know and love."

So.. you are saying that, if American's honestly believe someone is trying to radically alter America, in a bad way, they shouldn't stand up and do something about it?

"They not only disagree with Obama's policies, but they view him as a threat to the freedoms that have set this country apart for the past several centuries."

But the people on the left who called Bush a Nazi, called for his execution, etc. were patriots, right?

" high-ranking conservatives are actively engaged in this smear-campaign, and unfortunately, it has resonated with a large number of people."

Did you speak out when people did this against Bush? OR did you join in?

"Rather than presenting reasoned arguments about why the Democratic Party's policies are hurting America, they are shoring up fear and hatred of Obama and labeling Democrats as socialists."

There's plenty of reasoned arguments as to how Obama is hurting America out there (the national debt and unemployment being the #1 and #2 unarguable facts). You just aren't looking for them or reading them.

"Why wasn't George W. Bush called a socialist when his administration oversaw a huge expansion of the federal government's power, including an expansion of Medicare?"

He was called much, much worse, and the people screaming about Obama being smeared are the same people who smeared Bush. Hypocrites.

"The same people who are screaming that they "want to take their country back" because of Obama's socialist stimulus and health care bills had nothing to say about George W. Bush's expansion of Medicare or the stimulus package he signed."

You don't follow the tea party much, or any of the conservative "fear-mongerers". Glenn Beck, while Bush was in office, had plenty to say about Bush's expansion of the government. He wasn't happy with it.

"Thomas Jefferson once said that "whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government." Election season is upon us, and midterm elections are right around the corner.
It's time for everyone to calm down, put down their pitchforks and make informed decisions about whom to vote for."

yep. If people had done that 2 years ago we wouldn't be in this mess as badly today. I think it's also quite hypocritical that everyone praises the 'grassroots' campaign that swept Obama into office yet ridicules the tea party.

Omar- you're a liberal hack. Par for the course for the DA. But furthermore- I think you are racist. You have the perception that the Tea party is all angry white men (it's not, by the way), and you hate them because of that.

Why do you have to be racist Omar? Why can't you be more tolerant of others with different opinions and different cultures? Why are you fear-mongering about the tea party?

Anonymous
Wed Sep 29 2010 08:25
Check out Matt Taibbi's "Tea and Crackers" article in Rolling Stone regarding the tea party. He pretty much nails it.
BSME Alumni
Wed Sep 29 2010 07:15
I don’t care where BHO was born, or about his color or religion. However, I disagree with his policies and general behavior. In most cases his position is far from mine on immigration, economy, education, healthcare, military and I could go on and on. He simply does not share my world view and his associates do not either. He’s also treated the Brits, our closest allies, with gross disrespect. However, I can also say that I have agreed with him on several occasions . . . one being his position on Afghanistan. But overall, this guy is simply not good for me or the future of my family and apparently many others share that view. If our goal in the US was to have a President that happened to be “not white” there are many great options out there. Bobby Jindal or Allen West are candidates I would vote for and hope they run. No one candidate is going to agree 100% with my politics (or yours), but you vote for the closest fit. At his point, I’d vote for anyone that’s not BHO, but I hope to get much more.
B. Steadman
Wed Sep 29 2010 06:18
Barack Hussein Obama II was born August 4, 1961 at the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.

There is no way he is a 'Natural Born Citizen' as required for the office of President by the US Constitution. We need to demand Congress fully investigate all matters related to Obama's eligibility and, if justified, remove him from office.

See the following: WasObamaBornInKenya.com

Anonymous
Wed Sep 29 2010 05:58
I agree with the author 100%. The tea party has no answers to our problems, the tea party IS our problem. The tea party is just a sad group of old, white, racist bigots who are all going to die naturally very soon so they have NOTHING to say about our future. They can't stand the fact that we have a black president and when they howl "TAKE BACK AMERICA!!!" they mean to take it back from the minorities. They represent only the top 3% richest Americans so they are our cultural enemies. Barrack, don't dignify those low lifes by asking them for suggestions. Mark Montgomery
Anonymous
Wed Sep 29 2010 01:41
You don't need to be qualified to be chosen by the enemies to be their puppet. You just have to be devoid of values and willing to lie and cheat and steal.

Vote 'em all out in 2010.. they are destroying us.

SANITY!
Wed Sep 29 2010 01:40
This is exactly what Jon Stewart has been saying. RALLY FOR SANITY!!! OCT. 30th
Anonymous
Wed Sep 29 2010 01:36
You're right that many in the Tea Party probably fit your description, but not all of them are like that. You're generalizing.
Anonymous
Wed Sep 29 2010 01:24
"You can disagree with Obama's policies and still accept the fact that he is a Christian and not the African-Muslim spawn of Adolf Hitler."....LOL nice
Anonymous
Wed Sep 29 2010 01:24
Mr. Ghabra,

Among the ranks of members of reactionary movements spawned by political developments, like the Tea Party, there are bound to be a diverse variety of individuals. When a group of people are brought together by little more than a shared opposition to something else, it is inevitable that individuals within the movement will produce a message that strikes outsiders as incoherent, since, in the case of the Tea Party, the members of the movement oppose the Obama government for divergent, and often contrasting, reasons.

That being stated, it is difficult to pin down what the views and motivations of an "average" Tea Party member are. Observers in the media and the general public have had much difficulty in simplifying the discordant elements of the movement into a coherent message.

Unfortunately, the pool within the movement from which the media has drawn its material for crafting such a simplified message has been largely made up of those Tea Party members whose views lie far outside of the political mainstream. However few in numbers these people may be, they have been portrayed by some in the media as the "face" of the movement, in an effort to paint the movement as something much more radical, and indeed dangerous, than it is in reality. Danger, in journalism, draws attention and boosts ratings.

Naturally, many of the movement's political opponents have been all too happy to draw attention to the most radical elements of the Tea Party, in an effort to delegitimize it. This is a common political tactic, but using a small fragment of a movement in an attempt to delegitimize the movement in its entirety has an unhealthy effect on our political discourse, regardless of who employs the tactic. Throughout the last decade, allies of the Bush Administration used similar tactics, by drawing attention to the most violent and politically radical antiwar protesters, in an effort to soil the reputation of the antiwar movement as a whole. In doing this, they scored political points, but ultimately did an injustice to American political discourse, as the feelings of the droves of peaceful, rational, patriotic people who opposed the Iraq War were obscured by these petty tactics.

So while it is perfectly acceptable to be alarmed at some elements of the Tea Party, only viewing the party through the prism of its most extreme members obscures the legitimate view of the vast majority of its supporters; that the country is heading down a path that they feel will lead to fiscal ruin, and the curbing of individual liberties.

The proper course of action, for Americans of all political stripes, is to make a concerted effort to improve the political discourse of this nation, which has dissolved into a mish-mash of competing soundbites and baseless rhetoric that has made our political environment both exceptionally vicious, and based more in "scoring points" than in pursuing truth and compromise. A dangerous situation.

T. Andersen





log out